Badminton How To Play

Let me be honest with you - until last month, I barely paid attention to FCS football. Like most casual college football fans, my Saturdays were dominated by Alabama, Ohio State, and the other FBS powerhouses. That changed when I watched the Montana vs. North Dakota State game, where an unranked Montana squad pulled off what can only be described as the FCS equivalent of Eala's stunning upset over Swiatek at the Miami Open. Just as that 19-year-old tennis phenom defied expectations against the world's top player, Montana's victory reminded me why this "second tier" of college football often delivers the purest, most exciting version of the sport.

The Football Championship Subdivision, or FCS, represents 130 programs across 13 conferences that operate under NCAA Division I but with some key differences from their FBS counterparts. While FBS schools can offer up to 85 full scholarships, FCS programs are limited to 63 equivalencies, which they can split among more players. This creates more balanced competition - the talent gap between top and bottom teams isn't nearly as dramatic as in the FBS. Having visited several FCS programs, I've noticed the culture feels different too. These athletes aren't playing for national television contracts or future NFL millions; they're there for the love of the game. The energy at an FCS playoff game often surpasses what you'll find at mediocre FBS bowl games where half the stadium is empty.

What really separates FCS football structurally is its championship model. While the FBS relies on the controversial College Football Playoff system, the FCS has operated a 24-team playoff tournament since 2013. Every conference champion gets an automatic bid, with the remaining spots filled by at-large selections. This means every game matters, and Cinderella stories aren't just possible - they happen regularly. Just last season, we saw a 8-4 Holy Cross team advance to the quarterfinals, similar to how underdogs in March Madness capture the nation's attention. The playoff intensity creates moments that even the most prestigious FBS bowls struggle to match.

The financial realities of FCS football would shock many fans accustomed to the FBS's lavish spending. While Alabama's football program operates on a budget exceeding $130 million annually, top FCS programs like James Madison (before their recent transition to FBS) managed with around $12-15 million. This disparity affects everything from facilities to travel to recruiting. Yet somehow, these constraints often foster more creative coaching and player development. I've spoken with FCS coaches who've developed innovative schemes specifically to compete against better-funded opponents, much like mid-major basketball programs that use strategic advantages to overcome talent gaps.

Recruiting in FCS operates in a completely different universe. While FBS programs chase four and five-star recruits, FCS coaches are talent evaluators in the truest sense. They're looking for players with specific traits that might have been overlooked by bigger programs. The average FCS recruiting class ranks somewhere between 80th and 130th nationally if you were to mix them with FBS programs, yet these are the players who regularly develop into NFL prospects. Current NFL stars like Jimmy Garoppolo (Eastern Illinois), Cooper Kupp (Eastern Washington), and Darius Leonard (South Carolina State) all came from FCS programs that saw something others missed.

The FCS experience offers something increasingly rare in modern college sports: authenticity. Having attended games at both levels, I can tell you the difference is palpable. FCS stadiums are smaller, typically seating 15,000-25,000 fans compared to the 80,000+ behemoths of the FBS, but they're often packed with more passionate supporters. The traditions feel more organic, less manufactured for television. The bands play louder, the student sections are more engaged, and the connection between players and their communities feels genuine. In an era where college football is increasingly dominated by television contracts and corporate interests, FCS football preserves the soul of the sport.

Television coverage has improved dramatically over the past decade, with ESPN networks broadcasting numerous regular-season games and the entire playoff bracket. Still, the exposure doesn't compare to the FBS, which creates both challenges and opportunities. The lack of constant media scrutiny allows players to develop away from the spotlight, but it also means exceptional performances often go unrecognized nationally. I've watched FCS games where the quarterback play was as sophisticated as anything in the Power Five conferences, yet the quarterback might never appear on SportsCenter unless he transfers to an FBS program.

Looking at the broader landscape, the FCS faces significant challenges, particularly from conference realignment that has seen successful programs like Appalachian State, Georgia Southern, and most recently James Madison move to the FBS. This constant talent drain threatens competitive balance, yet the subdivision continues to produce compelling football year after year. The Missouri Valley Football Conference has emerged as arguably the strongest FCS conference, consistently placing multiple teams in the playoff quarterfinals and producing NFL talent at a remarkable rate.

Having immersed myself in FCS football this season, I've come to appreciate it not as a lesser version of college football but as a different expression of the sport. The upsets feel more meaningful, the playoff system more just, and the connection to tradition more palpable. While I'll still watch Alabama-Georgia with interest, my Saturdays now include tracking Big Sky and Colonial Athletic Association matchups with equal enthusiasm. The FCS embodies what made me fall in love with college football in the first place - unpredictable outcomes, visible player development, and communities united by their teams. In many ways, it's not college football's second tier but its purest form.