Badminton How To Play

As I look at the Albany Great Danes' current season trajectory, I can't help but feel that familiar mix of excitement and skepticism that comes with every March Madness conversation. Having followed college basketball for over fifteen years, I've seen enough bubble teams to recognize both the promising signs and the red flags. The Great Danes' recent 82-78 victory provides exactly the kind of dramatic storyline that makes NCAA tournament discussions so compelling, but whether it translates to genuine tournament credentials remains the million-dollar question.

That fourth-quarter comeback from 55-61 down to win 82-78 demonstrates something crucial that statistics alone can't capture - mental toughness. I've always believed that tournament-bound teams need that clutch gene, the ability to perform under pressure when everything's on the line. The way Albany closed out that game, outscoring their opponent 27-17 in the final quarter, shows they have players who aren't afraid of big moments. That's exactly what you need when facing single-elimination tournament basketball. Still, one dramatic win doesn't make a season, and I'm concerned about their consistency throughout the earlier quarters being stuck at 40-40 by halftime.

Looking at their quarter-by-quarter performance - 21-23, 40-40, 55-61 before that final push - reveals both the promise and the problems. The first half ending deadlocked at 40 points each suggests they can compete with teams, but that third quarter dip to 55-61 worries me. Tournament teams typically maintain intensity throughout the game, and these fluctuations could prove costly against top-tier competition. From my experience analyzing bracketology, the selection committee pays close attention to how teams perform in different game segments, not just final scores.

The reality is Albany faces an uphill battle, but not an impossible one. Their 82-point offensive output in that recent game shows they can score when needed, which matters tremendously come tournament time. I've always valued teams that can win different types of games - whether it's a defensive grind or a shootout. The Great Danes demonstrated they can win a higher-scoring affair, which expands their potential matchup advantages. However, giving up 78 points raises defensive concerns that could haunt them against more disciplined offensive teams.

What really gives me hope is their demonstrated resilience. Coming back from that six-point deficit in the fourth quarter requires more than just skill - it takes heart and belief. I've seen countless bubble teams fold under similar pressure, but Albany showed the exact opposite tendency. That intangible quality often separates teams that sneak into the tournament from those who watch from home. Still, they'll need to prove this wasn't just a one-off performance but part of a sustainable pattern.

Ultimately, while the Great Danes have shown flashes of tournament-caliber basketball, their path likely requires winning their conference tournament rather than hoping for an at-large bid. The quarter-by-quarter inconsistencies and defensive lapses would concern the selection committee, but that fourth-quarter comeback capability gives them a puncher's chance. Having witnessed similar stories throughout my years covering college basketball, I'd put their tournament chances at around 35% - not great, but certainly not impossible. They've shown they can deliver when it matters most, and in March, that sometimes counts for everything.