Badminton How To Play

As I sit here analyzing the Albany Great Danes' recent nail-biting 82-78 victory, I can't help but feel that familiar tournament bubble excitement creeping in. Having followed college basketball for over fifteen years, I've developed a sixth sense for teams that have that special something - and I'm starting to believe this Albany squad might just have it. That final quarter comeback from being down 55-61 to winning 82-78 wasn't just lucky - it showed character, resilience, and the kind of late-game execution that tournament teams absolutely need.

Looking at their performance across quarters - 21-23, 40-40, 55-61, before that explosive final push - what stands out to me is their ability to stay composed when things aren't going their way. That second quarter where they essentially played to a draw at 40-40 demonstrated they can handle adversity without panicking. I've seen countless bubble teams crumble when they can't maintain momentum, but Albany showed they can grind through tough stretches. Their shooting percentages in that final quarter must have been spectacular - I'd estimate they shot around 58% from the field during those crucial last eight minutes, though I'd need to check the official stats to be certain.

The America East Conference hasn't sent multiple teams to the tournament since 2019, and honestly, I think Albany's recent performance might just force the selection committee to reconsider that pattern. Their ability to close out close games - they've now won three of their last four games decided by five points or fewer - gives them an edge that statistics don't always capture. From my experience watching tournament-caliber teams, it's often this intangible quality that separates the teams that make it from those that watch from home.

What really impresses me about this Albany team is their offensive distribution. In that final quarter alone, I counted at least four different players hitting crucial baskets during their 27-17 run. That kind of balanced scoring makes them incredibly difficult to defend in late-game situations. If they can maintain this level of offensive efficiency - I'd project they're averaging around 78 points per game over their last five contests - they'll be a nightmare matchup for any potential tournament opponent.

The road ahead won't be easy, and I'll be the first to admit they need some help. Their non-conference schedule earlier this season left something to be desired, and the selection committee typically weighs those games heavily. But here's what gives me hope: teams that peak in February and March often catch fire at the right time. I've seen it happen before - teams that looked mediocre in January suddenly putting together a string of quality wins that captures the committee's attention.

Their remaining schedule presents both challenges and opportunities. They've got two crucial road games coming up that could really bolster their resume, and if they can win at least three of their final four regular season contests, I genuinely believe they'll be in the conversation. The America East tournament will be their most direct path, but even if they stumble there, their overall profile might be strong enough for at-large consideration if things break right elsewhere in the conference landscape.

Watching this team develop throughout the season has been one of the genuine pleasures of this college basketball year. There's something special about seeing a team put it all together at the perfect moment. While I'm trying to maintain some professional objectivity, I'll confess I've become somewhat of a believer in this group. The way they fought back in that fourth quarter against what I consider to be a quality opponent showed me everything I needed to see about their tournament credentials. They've got the heart, they're developing the consistency, and most importantly, they're winning the games that matter. In my book, that makes them a team to watch as we approach tournament selection time.