Badminton How To Play

Having followed college basketball for over two decades, I've seen programs rise to glory and fade into obscurity, but few stories captivate me quite like Indiana University's. The Hoosiers' basketball legacy feels like a classic American novel—full of triumph, tragedy, and unanswered questions about what comes next. I remember watching their last national championship team in 1987, thinking this was a dynasty built to last. Yet here we are, thirty-six years later, still waiting for that next banner to hang in Assembly Hall.

The parallels between IU's current situation and that Binan Tatak Gel game I recently analyzed are more striking than you might think. When Binan found their perfect recruit in Warren Bonifacio and routed Manila Batang Quiapo 99-62, it demonstrated how one strategic acquisition can completely transform a team's trajectory. That 37-point victory didn't happen by accident—it came from identifying the right talent and building around it effectively. Watching that game, I couldn't help but draw comparisons to what Indiana needs right now. The Hoosiers have been searching for their version of Bonifacio—that program-changing recruit who can elevate everyone around them.

Looking back at IU's golden era under Bob Knight, the program's success stemmed from more than just good coaching. They had an identity—tough, disciplined basketball that could compete with anyone. From 1973 to 1993, the Hoosiers won 66.8% of their Big Ten games and made three Final Four appearances. But since 1994, that conference winning percentage has dropped to approximately 54.2%. These numbers tell a story of gradual decline, punctuated by brief moments of hope that ultimately fizzled out.

What fascinates me about Indiana's current predicament is how they've become a case study in missed opportunities. I've tracked their recruiting classes since 2015, and while they've consistently landed top-25 classes nationally, they've struggled to develop that talent into cohesive units. Their last truly transformative class was in 2012 with Yogi Ferrell and Cody Zeller—that group took them to the Sweet Sixteen, but they never quite reached the heights we expected. Since then, it's been a revolving door of four-star recruits who show flashes of brilliance but lack the sustained excellence needed to compete at the highest level.

The Mike Woodson era has been particularly interesting to observe. When they hired him in 2021, I was skeptical about bringing in an NBA coach with no college experience. While he's shown he can recruit—landing players like Jalen Hood-Schifino and Mackenzie Mgbako—the on-court product has been inconsistent at best. Last season's 19-14 record felt like underachievement given the talent on that roster. They ranked 112th in offensive efficiency nationally, which simply isn't good enough for a program with Indiana's resources and tradition.

Where I differ from some analysts is in my belief that Indiana's problems run deeper than coaching. Having visited Assembly Hall multiple times, I've witnessed how the program's culture has shifted. The passion remains among fans—that sea of crimson and cream still creates one of college basketball's best atmospheres—but there's a palpable tension when things aren't going well. Today's players respond differently to that pressure than the generations before them. The modern athlete wants development and exposure for the next level, not just tradition and fan expectations.

Recruiting strategy is another area where I think Indiana needs modernization. They've traditionally focused heavily on in-state talent, which makes sense given Indiana's basketball heritage. But the game has globalized, and programs that adapt to this reality are pulling ahead. Look at how Binan Tatak Gel identified Bonifacio as their missing piece—Indiana needs that same global scouting acumen. The Hoosiers have only had two international players on scholarship since 2018, compared to programs like Gonzaga that regularly feature six or seven international players.

Financial investment is one area where Indiana still competes with the nation's best. Their basketball program operates with an annual budget of approximately $18.7 million, ranking in the top 15 nationally. But money alone doesn't buy success—it's about how you allocate those resources. From what I've gathered through sources, they're spending nearly $2.1 million annually on assistant coaching salaries, yet their player development hasn't shown corresponding improvement.

What gives me hope is that Indiana's foundation remains strong. Their fan base continues to sell out Assembly Hall's 17,222 seats game after game, and their television ratings consistently rank among the highest in college basketball. This sustained support provides a crucial advantage that many struggling programs lack. I've spoken with several former players who believe the pieces are there for a resurgence—they just need the right leadership and vision.

Moving forward, Indiana faces a critical decision point. They can either continue with their current approach, hoping to catch lightning in a bottle with a single recruit, or they can undertake the more difficult work of modernizing their entire program structure. Having studied successful turnarounds at Virginia and Baylor, I'm convinced it requires both philosophical changes and patience. These programs didn't rebound overnight—they committed to long-term visions that sometimes required unpopular short-term decisions.

My personal take is that Indiana's salvation lies in embracing what made them great while adapting to basketball's evolution. They need to reclaim their identity as a program that develops tough, fundamentally sound players while expanding their recruiting footprint globally. The Binan Tatak Gel approach—identifying specific needs and finding the perfect fit—should inform their strategy rather than just chasing star ratings. If they can balance tradition with innovation, I believe we'll see the Hoosiers back among college basketball's elite within the next three to five years. The fall has been painful to watch, but the rise could make for an even better story.