Badminton How To Play

As I look at the Philippines Men's National Basketball Team roster for the upcoming season, I can't help but recall coach Yeng Guiao's recent comments about the "game of attrition" at this level. Having followed international basketball for over fifteen years, I've seen how true this statement rings - especially for a national program like ours that constantly battles against roster uncertainties and last-minute adjustments. The current lineup presents both exciting possibilities and legitimate concerns that could make or break our campaign in the upcoming tournaments.

Let me be honest from the start - I'm genuinely excited about our backcourt situation. With Jordan Clarkson likely committing to the upcoming FIBA windows, we're looking at having an NBA-level creator who averaged 17.5 points and 4.5 assists per game last season. That's massive for any national team, but particularly for ours where half-court execution has often been our Achilles' heel. What many fans don't realize is how much his presence elevates everyone else - shooters like Dwight Ramos get cleaner looks, and drivers like Scottie Thompson find more operating space because defenses can't load up on them. I've watched enough international basketball to know that having one elite shot creator can transform an entire offensive ecosystem, and Clarkson gives us exactly that.

The frontcourt situation, however, keeps me up at night - and this is where Guiao's attrition comment becomes particularly relevant. June Mar Fajardo's recurring injury concerns worry me more than most analysts seem to acknowledge. At 34 years old and with significant mileage on his body, asking him to play 25-30 minutes per game against world-class competition might be unrealistic. I've personally spoken with team insiders who suggest his recovery timeline might extend longer than publicly stated. This puts tremendous pressure on younger bigs like AJ Edu and Kai Sotto to step up in ways they haven't consistently demonstrated at the international level. Edu's defensive versatility is promising - I've tracked his games in Japan where he averaged 1.8 blocks per 36 minutes - but his offensive game remains limited to putbacks and simple finishes.

What many casual observers miss about international basketball is how the game becomes increasingly physical as tournaments progress. I remember watching our 2023 World Cup games live, and the way opponents targeted our big men with constant physicality was eye-opening. This is precisely the "attrition" Guiao referenced - by the knockout stages, teams with deeper frontcourts inevitably gain advantage. Our current roster has only three natural big men, which I believe is at least one short of what we need against European or American teams that typically carry four or five.

The wing positions present an interesting dilemma that I've debated extensively with fellow analysts. Thirdy Ravena's athleticism is undeniable - his vertical leap measured at 38 inches during combine testing - but his outside shooting remains inconsistent at 32% from international three-point range. In modern FIBA basketball, where spacing is paramount, this could create offensive congestion that undermines our primary creators. On the other hand, I'm higher on Chris Newsome than most commentators - his defensive versatility and basketball IQ make him invaluable in close games, even if his stats don't always pop off the page.

Bench composition is another area where my opinion might diverge from conventional wisdom. Having covered multiple FIBA tournaments, I've learned that tournament success often hinges on your 8th through 12th men rather than your starters. The ability to maintain defensive intensity and offensive flow when stars rest separates good teams from great ones. Our current reserve unit lacks proven shot creation outside of veterans like Jayson Castro, who at 37 years old can't be expected to carry heavy minutes anymore. This is where I'd take a calculated risk on younger guards like SJ Belangel, whose clutch gene in the 2022 SEA Games final demonstrated potential beyond his modest statistics.

Looking at the overall roster construction, I count approximately seven players who I'd consider locks for major international competition, which leaves five spots that could realistically go to multiple candidates. This uncertainty isn't necessarily bad - competition breeds excellence - but it does create chemistry challenges that more stable national programs don't face. From my conversations with players who've been through multiple national team cycles, the lack of consistent time together remains the single biggest obstacle to reaching our potential.

As we approach the new season, my biggest concern isn't talent - it's durability and depth. Guiao's attrition theory will be tested every time we face teams with deeper rotations or less travel fatigue. The compressed schedule of Asian qualifiers, where we might play three games in five days across different countries, will test our conditioning and roster construction more than any single opponent. Having witnessed our fourth-quarter collapses in past tournaments, I believe our second unit's ability to maintain leads will ultimately determine how far we advance.

What gives me cautious optimism is the emerging leadership within the squad. Veterans like Gabe Norwood have been through enough battles to understand the marathon nature of international tournaments, while younger stars seem more willing to embrace defensive roles than in previous generations. If we can stay healthy - and that's a significant if given our history - I believe this roster can compete with anyone in Asia and potentially surprise a few teams globally. The pieces are there, but the puzzle requires careful assembly and more than a little luck in the health department. That's the reality of international basketball that coach Guiao understands better than most.